Leave Encashment in India: Rules, Calculation and Tax

Every HR manager in India has had this conversation. An employee resigns, the new offer is signed, and somewhere between the exit interview and the final payroll run someone asks: "What about my 34 days of leave?" The answer you give — and the number that lands on the settlement statement — depends on a chain of decisions your company probably made years ago, possibly by accident. Leave encashment looks like a small arithmetic problem and turns out to be a policy problem, an accounting problem and a tax problem wearing one coat.

It gets messy because almost nothing about it is fixed by a single central rule. Earned leave entitlement comes from your state's Shops and Establishments Act or the Factories Act framework, modified by whatever your appointment letter promised. The per-day rate depends on which salary components you include and what divisor you use. Tax treatment depends on whether payment happens during service or at exit, and on whether the employee is a government or non-government employee. Balance-sheet treatment depends on how finance models the liability. Change any one and the same employee with the same 34 days walks away with materially different money.

This guide covers all of it: the three moments encashment happens, the statutory backdrop, which leave types qualify, the wage base and divisor debates, two full worked examples, carry-forward design, settlement mechanics, liability provisioning, tax handling, and concrete policy defaults for a 50 to 500 person company. Where a figure is set by statute and changes over time, this article gives you the shape of the rule and asks you to verify the current notified number rather than quoting one that may be stale.

What leave encashment actually is

Leave encashment is the conversion of unused paid leave into cash. The employee earned the right to be absent with pay, chose not to use it, and receives the monetary value instead. Everything complicated flows from three questions: which leave counts, what is a day worth, and when does conversion happen.

Worth remembering why leave exists. Earned leave — also called privilege or annual leave — is a statutory rest entitlement, and the intent is that people actually take time off. Encashment is a concession, not the purpose. That framing matters, because a generous scheme quietly turns a rest benefit into a savings plan, and you end up with senior staff who have not had a proper break in four years sitting on 90-day balances your CFO must fund. One definitional point while we are here: encashment is not leave-without-pay recovery, not leave travel allowance, and not compensation for working a holiday. Lump overtime buyouts, comp-off payments and encashment into one head called "Other Allowances" and you will regret it during a tax review.

The three moments leave encashment happens

Annual or periodic encashment during service. The employee stays employed and converts part of the balance to cash, usually at year end. Companies do this to control liability growth or as a soft benefit. For a private-sector employee this is salary income, fully taxable, with TDS in the month of payment.

Encashment at exit — resignation or termination. Paid in the full and final settlement alongside last salary, gratuity if eligible, and any recoveries. For non-government employees this can qualify for exemption up to a statutory ceiling, subject to prescribed limits, with the balance taxable.

Encashment at retirement or superannuation. Mechanically identical to exit, but this is the case the exemption provisions were designed around. Government employees generally receive full exemption; non-government employees get relief only up to a prescribed ceiling computed under a formula. That ceiling is a lifetime aggregate across all employers, which surprises people who have changed jobs several times.

A fourth case is encashment on death, paid to the nominee. Treatment of amounts received by heirs differs from salary in the employee's hands — take specific advice rather than applying your standard exit template.

Statutory backdrop, in general terms

India has no single national leave law covering every private employer. You get a patchwork.

Factories fall under the Factories Act framework, which provides annual leave with wages after a qualifying period, expressed as one day of leave per defined number of days worked, with a right to carry forward unavailed leave up to a cap and an obligation to pay for unavailed leave in certain exit situations. Shops, offices, retail outlets and IT companies — most CozyHR customers — fall under their state's Shops and Establishments Act.

Every state writes its own. The general pattern: employees completing a qualifying period of continuous service become entitled to a minimum number of earned or privileged leave days per year, either as a flat annual figure or an accrual ratio tied to days worked. States typically also prescribe a minimum carry-forward you must permit, and many require unavailed earned leave to be paid out when employment ends. Casual and sick leave are prescribed separately, generally lapsing annually and not encashable.

Three consequences. Your floor is set by the state where the employee's workplace is registered, not your head office — a Bengaluru company with Pune and Gurugram offices may face three floors, which is why most multi-state employers write one policy at or above the most generous. Statutory numbers are minimums; if your appointment letter promises 24 days and the state minimum is 15, the contract governs. And — carry this caveat through the rest of the article — accrual ratios, carry-forward caps and payout obligations vary by state and get amended, so verify your state's current rules before finalising policy and again when you open a new location.

Which leave types are encashable

This is where avoidable disputes start. An employee reads "12 casual, 12 sick, 18 earned" and mentally adds them to a 42-day encashable balance. Be explicit.

The defensible logic: only leave the employee earned through service and that the law lets them accumulate should be encashable. If you encash sick leave you create an incentive to come to work unwell, which is a strange thing for an HR policy to do, and you inflate a liability that was never meant to exist.

Comp-off is the most commonly mishandled bucket in Indian SMBs. Let it accumulate indefinitely and then encash it, and you have built an uncapped overtime scheme with no overtime controls. Clean design: comp-off must be availed within 30 or 60 days, expires automatically, never encashable. If you genuinely need to pay for holiday work, pay it as an explicit allowance in the month it happens, where it is visible, budgeted and correctly taxed.

The wage base question

This decision moves the money most. Encashment value equals days times a per-day rate, and the rate is a monthly wage figure divided by a divisor. Which monthly wage figure?

Basic only — cheapest, most conservative, common in older manufacturing setups and where basic is a large share of CTC. Basic + DA — the classic statutory-style base; for companies paying no DA it collapses back to basic. Fixed gross — basic plus all fixed monthly allowances, excluding variable pay, reimbursements, bonus and employer PF or gratuity contributions. Basic + DA + a named list of allowances — less common but often the most honest, because it forces you to decide on each component instead of inheriting a definition.

Take an employee on ₹80,000 fixed monthly gross.

Holding the divisor at 30 and the balance at 25 days:

A ₹43,200 spread — more than 2.5x — for the same person and the same 25 days. Across a workforce, the wage base is one of the larger uncosted items in your compensation design.

Guidance. If basic is 50 percent or more of gross, basic-only encashment is defensible and employees will not feel short-changed. If basic sits at 30 to 35 percent, which is very common in Indian startups, basic-only produces a payout that feels insulting next to a day's pay — either raise the base or raise basic. Never include variable pay, reimbursements or employer statutory contributions; reimbursements are cost recovery, and PF and gratuity are separate obligations. Whatever you pick, write it into the policy in exact words and use the same base for annual and exit encashment.

One floor to respect: where a state Act or the Factories Act framework prescribes payment for unavailed leave at a defined wage rate, the statute wins if your policy pays less.

The divisor debate: 26, 30 or actual days

Divide by 30. Every month treated as 30 days. Simple, predictable, matches how most Indian payroll systems compute loss of pay. The dominant private-sector convention. Divide by 26. The month is treated as 26 working days, on the logic that four weekly offs are already paid within the salary. Embedded in several statutory computations and common in manufacturing; produces a rate about 15 percent higher. Divide by actual calendar days. Precise for LOP, but an employee resigning in February gets a better rate than one resigning in March — impossible to defend as fair. Divide by actual working days. Highest rate, most volatile, rarely used for encashment.

Same employee, 25-day balance:

The gross row runs from ₹64,516 to ₹90,909. Same person, same balance, same month.

For a 50 to 500 person company: use 30, apply it to both encashment and loss of pay, and write it into the policy. Consistency matters more than theoretical precision, because employees notice when a day of unpaid absence costs more than a day of encashed leave pays. Use 26 only if your industry conventionally computes on that basis — and then use it for LOP too, so the internal logic holds.

Step-by-step leave encashment calculation

Once the policy is locked, the leave encashment calculation is six steps.

1. Determine the encashable balance. Closing earned leave as on the cut-off date, excluding casual, sick and comp-off. Adjust for approved-but-untaken and pending applications.
2. Apply the encashment cap. Most policies limit days per event — say 10 per year in service, or a ceiling at exit.
3. Apply minimum retention if your policy requires the employee to keep a residual balance after annual encashment.
4. Compute the per-day rate. Wage base divided by divisor, per policy.
5. Multiply and round. Document the rounding rule; nearest rupee is standard.
6. Determine the taxable portion, deduct TDS, pay.

Two details that catch people out. Half-day balances: if you allow half-day applications, balances end in .5. Decide whether you encash halves or round down, and be consistent. Final part-month accrual: if someone leaves on the 18th, do they accrue for that month? Pro-rata is fairest and easiest to defend; "full month or nothing" is also defensible if stated up front. What you cannot do is decide case by case.

Worked example 1: annual encashment during service

Priya works at a 180-person SaaS company. Leave year runs January to December.

Policy: earned leave only; base basic + DA (no DA paid); divisor 30; annual encashment capped at 10 days; 10 days must be retained.

Balance: 12 + 18 − 9 = 21 days of EL. The 10 days of casual and sick leave do not enter the calculation. Caps: she may encash up to 10, and encashing 10 would still leave 11, satisfying retention. She applies for 8. Rate: ₹38,000 ÷ 30 = ₹1,266.67. Gross: 8 × ₹1,266.67 = ₹10,133. Tax: in-service encashment is fully taxable salary; the amount is added to her annual projection and TDS recomputed. At a roughly 30 percent marginal rate she nets around ₹7,000. Closing balance: 13 days carried forward.

Notice what she experienced. A day of her leave is worth ₹1,267, but a day of her time is worth ₹95,000 ÷ 30 = ₹3,167 in gross terms — the basic-only base makes her encashment worth 40 percent of a day's pay. That is the conversation that lands on HR's desk every January, and it is a policy consequence, not an error.

Worked example 2: exit encashment in full and final settlement

Rahul resigns after four years. Last working day 20 September.

Policy: exit encashment capped at 45 days; base basic + DA; divisor 30; pro-rata accrual for the final part-month.

Balance: 34 days plus September pro-rata of 1.5 × (20 ÷ 30) = 1.0 day, so 35 days, within the cap. Rate: ₹56,000 ÷ 30 = ₹1,866.67. Gross encashment: 35 × ₹1,866.67 = ₹65,333.

Tax. Encashment received on leaving service can qualify for exemption for a non-government employee, up to a statutory ceiling and subject to a prescribed computation considering average salary, months of service and an entitlement limit. The ceiling is a lifetime aggregate across employers and is revised by notification. Verify the current notified ceiling and the computation rules under the tax regime the employee has opted for before finalising the exemption. Anything not exempt is taxable salary.

Note that the notice recovery and salary advance do not reduce taxable salary. Notice-pay recovery is generally treated as an application of income rather than a reduction of salary income, and treatment has historically been divergent. Compute tax on gross earnings and treat recoveries as post-tax deductions unless you have advice to the contrary — netting first will under-withhold and surface as a Form 16 mismatch.

Negative balances

The mirror image is the employee who leaves overdrawn, having taken more leave than accrued. This happens routinely when companies front-load the annual credit on 1 January. An employee credited 18 days who takes 14 by April and resigns on 30 April has earned about 6 days on a monthly basis and is 8 days overdrawn. You can recover the excess at the per-day rate (standard, and it should be in the policy and appointment letter), waive it (fine once, dangerous as a pattern), or convert it to loss of pay in the final month — the same money, a different line.

The real fix is upstream: accrue monthly rather than front-loading. Balances then only ever reflect leave actually earned, negative balances are rare and small, and your liability grows smoothly instead of spiking every January.

Earned leave carry forward, caps and lapse

Four levers control the size of the problem. The accrual rate and frequency (monthly accrual of 1.25, 1.5 or 1.75 days is cleanest). The carry-forward cap, the maximum balance moving into the next year, typically 30 to 45 days — remembering your state Act may prescribe a minimum you must allow. The accumulation ceiling, an absolute maximum balance beyond which accrual pauses, which hard-caps liability per employee and forces people to take breaks. And the year-end decision on excess: lapse it, or auto-encash it.

On "use it or lose it": pure lapse works only if three conditions hold. The cap is genuinely reachable (a 45-day cap on 18 days of accrual means near-zero leave for three years, so lapse rarely bites). Balances are communicated continuously, not in a panicked email on 15 December. And managers actually approve leave — a lapse policy in a company that declines leave during crunch periods is a way of taking back a benefit you already granted, and employees will read it exactly that way.

The blend most mid-size companies land on: monthly accrual, carry-forward cap around 45 days, hard ceiling at 60, voluntary annual encashment of 10 to 15 days with minimum retention, lapse only above the ceiling.

One more choice: does your leave year run January to December, or April to March? Financial-year alignment puts provisioning, payouts and Form 16 in one period; calendar alignment is more intuitive for employees. Either works. What does not work is a leave year on one basis and the accrual reset on another.

Leave encashment in full and final settlement

Full and final settlement leave payouts are the highest-stakes encashment events — one-shot, irreversible, and often the last thing an employee remembers about you.

Freeze the balance on a defined date, usually the last working day, with all applications approved before it. Publish the cut-off in the exit checklist, or you will get applications after the freeze and a dispute.

Reconcile against attendance. Leave taken but never applied for is the single largest source of FnF disputes. Reconcile before you calculate, not after the employee queries the number.

Handle the notice interplay explicitly. Three scenarios recur. The employee wants to use leave as notice — most companies decline by default, since notice exists for handover; say whether it is permitted and who approves. The employee wants encashment to offset a notice shortfall — netting a payable against a recoverable is fine if your policy allows, but note the asymmetry: encashment is income, possibly partly exempt, while notice recovery is generally not deductible from salary income, so netting on the payslip changes nothing for tax. The company waives notice — do not recover shortfall, and encash normally.

Sequence the recoveries — notice shortfall, salary advance, unreturned assets, training bond, excess leave — and decide whether the settlement can go negative. Invoicing a former employee rarely ends well; many companies cap recovery at the net payable.

Pay within a published SLA, 30 or 45 days from the last working day. Delayed FnF is among the most common grievances filed with labour authorities, and encashment is usually the largest disputed component. And give a line-item statement, not a net figure — most disputes evaporate when the arithmetic is visible.

Leave liability provision: what finance needs

HR usually does not think about this and finance usually cannot get the data.

Unused encashable leave is a liability. The employee has rendered service, earned a right to paid absence or cash, and you will settle it in future. Indian accounting standards for employee benefits require accumulating compensated absences to be recognised as an expense when the employee renders the service that increases the entitlement — not when the leave is taken or encashed. The cost hits your P&L as people earn leave.

The consequence is real. A company that never provisioned and grew to 300 people over five years with a generous accumulation policy is carrying a large obligation appearing nowhere in management accounts. When auditors insist on recognition, the catch-up provision is a one-time hit to a single year's profit — usually discovered during diligence, which is the worst possible time.

At its simplest, the leave liability provision is encashable balance per employee × per-day rate, summed across the workforce, giving the gross undiscounted obligation at the reporting date. From there: split short-term and long-term (benefits expected to be settled within twelve months are measured undiscounted; the rest are other long-term employee benefits, measured actuarially and discounted); distinguish availment from encashment, because leave that gets taken costs salary you would have paid anyway, leave that lapses costs nothing, and only encashed leave is incremental cash; and factor in attrition and salary growth, since 40 days held by someone retiring in fifteen years is a very different present value from 40 days held by a likely resigner.

Most SMBs start simple and move to actuarial when the auditor asks, balances become material, or external scrutiny approaches. Under one percent of annual employee cost, nobody will push you; past five percent, expect questions.

Finance needs four things from HR at each reporting date: per-employee encashable balance (not total balance) as at that date; the per-day rate basis, applied consistently and matching what you would actually pay; policy parameters — caps, lapse rules, entitlements — which drive the modelling assumptions; and historical behaviour, meaning what proportion of accrued leave was availed, lapsed and encashed over two or three years plus attrition by tenure band. Actuaries ask for exactly that last item and HR teams routinely cannot produce it. If your leave data lives in spreadsheets rebuilt annually, it is impossible — an underrated reason to run leave on a real system.

Tax treatment and TDS mechanics

A few features of the framework are stable enough to state in general terms.

Encashment during service is taxable. For a private-sector employee, encashment received while still employed is salary income, fully taxable, with no exemption available. TDS applies and it appears in Form 16.

Encashment at retirement or on leaving service is treated differently. Government employees generally receive full exemption. Non-government employees receive exemption only up to a statutory ceiling, computed under a prescribed formula considering average salary over a recent period, period of service, leave availed, and an entitlement limit expressed in days per year of completed service. The exempt amount is the least of several specified figures, one of which is an absolute monetary ceiling notified by government.

Three things about that ceiling are widely misunderstood. It is a lifetime limit across all employers, not per job — if an employee claimed exemption at a previous employer, that reduces what remains, so ask departing employees to declare prior exemptions. It has been revised over time, so do not hardcode a number into your rules engine and forget it. And the tax regime the employee has opted for affects the outcome, since India runs parallel regimes with different treatment of exemptions — configure this per employee, not globally.

Do not treat this or any article as your source for the number. Confirm the current ceiling, the formula components and the regime interaction from the notified rules or with your advisor before computing an exit settlement.

TDS in the payroll cycle

For in-service encashment, add the amount to the projected annual salary, recompute annual tax and remaining monthly TDS. Pay it in the last month of the financial year and the whole incremental tax lands in one month — warn the employee, or schedule payouts earlier so the tax spreads.

For exit encashment, compute the exempt portion first, add only the taxable portion, project the full year including all settlement components, and deduct on the settlement. Two complications: if the employee joins a new employer the same year, both employers project full-year income independently and total withholding runs short — this is why Form 12B exists. And where FnF is paid a month or two after the last working day, the standard position is that it belongs to the month of payment.

Reporting. Show encashment as a distinct component in the Form 16 breakup, with the exempt portion separate where applicable. Dump it into a generic allowance head and the employee's return filing becomes guesswork.

On other statutes: encashment is generally not part of wages for provident fund, since it does not compensate work in the contribution period, though wage definitions under the labour codes have been an area of active change — verify rather than assume. Similar caution for ESI. Gratuity is a separate calculation with its own exemption and ceiling; employees frequently assume the two share a limit, and they do not. Encashment does not enter the bonus base.

Designing your policy: 12 decisions

If you are writing or rewriting this policy for a 50 to 500 person company, here are the decisions with recommended defaults. Treat them as a starting draft, then adjust for your state's rules, industry and salary structure.

Two more worth writing down. Leave during notice: not permitted except with written manager and HR approval, which blocks the "I will take leave instead of serving notice" pattern without banning genuine cases. Probation: leave accrues but cannot be availed or encashed until confirmation.

A workable policy document runs: scope, definitions ("earned leave," "wage base," "leave year," "per-day rate"), accrual, carry-forward and lapse, in-service encashment, exit encashment, excess leave taken, a tax note with disclaimer, approval workflow, and effective date with transition rules. That last one is the forgotten item. If you tighten a cap from unlimited to 45 days, what happens to the person holding 82? Grandfathering — freeze the balance, allow encashment at exit, stop further accumulation — avoids the perception that you confiscated an earned benefit.

Approval workflows and controls

Encashment is a cash payout triggered by a data field, which makes it a control point.

Segregate duties. Whoever can edit a leave balance should not approve the payout. In small companies one generalist does both and the control is nonexistent; at minimum require a second approval for manual adjustments.

Log every manual adjustment — who, when, old value, new value, reason. Any balance change not arising from an approved application or scheduled accrual should be traceable. This is the most valuable control in leave administration and the most commonly missing.

Route approvals properly. Employee requests, manager approves (confirming no unrecorded absence), HR verifies against policy caps, payroll processes. For exit encashment, add finance sign-off on the FnF total, and escalate any payout above a defined rupee or day threshold to the HR head or CFO.

Reconcile before every payout run, matching balances to attendance for the period. Absences with no application are the leak.

Confirm balances annually. Send every employee their balance once a year to confirm or dispute within a window. It takes an afternoon if your system can generate it and eliminates the "I always had 40 days" argument three years later.

How HR software should handle leave encashment

What good looks like, if you are evaluating or configuring an HRMS.

An accrual engine driven by rules, not scripts — rate, frequency, proration, probation behaviour and pause-on-ceiling as settings, not custom code that breaks when policy changes. Independent rules per leave type; if the system treats all leave alike you will maintain a shadow spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet will win. Balance as at any date, because FnF needs the last working day and provisioning needs the reporting date. An encashment request workflow that validates caps, retention and eligibility at submission, routes approvals, and hands off to payroll as a distinct earnings component. A configurable formula where wage base, divisor and rounding are settings, with a visible breakdown employees and auditors can follow. Payroll integration with correct tax handling, so the component carries its own rule — fully taxable in service, exemption-eligible at exit — per employee, based on regime election and declared prior exemptions. An FnF module that freezes the balance, applies pro-rata accrual, nets recoveries and produces a line-item statement.

Three reports finance needs: a leave liability report showing encashable balance times rate as at any date, split by cost centre; a utilisation report showing accrued, availed, lapsed and encashed by period, which is what actuaries request; and a balance ageing report so you see accumulation building before it becomes a problem. Plus an audit log across balances, policy changes, approvals and payouts.

Common mistakes

Encashing leave types never meant to be encashed, usually sick leave or comp-off, because someone said yes once and it became precedent. Different wage bases for different employees, where seniors negotiated gross-based encashment and juniors get basic-only — a discrimination risk and an audit finding waiting to happen. Inconsistent divisors between LOP and encashment, which employees spot immediately. Front-loading leave and then fighting about recovery at exit. Carrying no provision, because the liability is real whether or not you record it.

On tax: treating the exemption ceiling as per-employer when it is a lifetime aggregate, hardcoding a stale limit into payroll, and netting notice recovery before computing tax.

On process: no reconciliation between attendance and leave, so unrecorded absences inflate the payout; balances living only in spreadsheets, with no history and no audit trail; silent policy changes with no transition rules; no cut-off communication at exit; lapse policies in companies where managers routinely decline leave; and confusing encashment with gratuity in employee communication.

Frequently asked questions

Is leave encashment mandatory in India?

Payment for unavailed earned leave when employment ends is required under many state Shops and Establishments Acts and the Factories Act framework, though specifics vary by state and establishment type. Encashment during service is generally not mandatory — that is a policy choice. Check your state's Act for exit obligations, and remember your appointment letter binds you regardless of the statutory minimum.

Can an employer refuse leave encashment?

For in-service encashment, yes, if your policy does not offer it and is written, communicated and applied consistently. At exit, refusal is much harder to defend where the state Act requires payment for unavailed earned leave. Refusing a legitimately accrued balance is a common trigger for labour-authority complaints, and the amounts are usually large enough that people pursue them.

Is leave encashment taxable?

During service it is fully taxable salary for non-government employees. At retirement or on leaving service it is fully exempt for government employees; for non-government employees it is exempt only up to a statutory ceiling computed under a prescribed formula, with the balance taxable. That ceiling is a lifetime aggregate across employers, is revised periodically, and can interact with your chosen tax regime. Verify the current notified limit before relying on any figure.

How is the per-day rate calculated?

Take the monthly wage base your policy defines — basic only, basic plus DA, or fixed gross — and divide by the policy divisor, usually 30 (26 in many statutory-style computations). Multiply by encashable days. Those two choices together can change the payout by more than a factor of two, which is why both belong in writing.

What happens to leave above the carry-forward cap?

Entirely a policy matter. The three options are lapse, automatic encashment of the excess, or an accumulation ceiling that pauses further accrual. Whichever you pick, communicate balances well before the cut-off and give people a genuine chance to use the leave. Also check whether your state prescribes a minimum carry-forward you must permit — you can be more generous, not less.

Can an employee use leave to cover their notice period?

Only if your policy allows it. Most companies do not permit it by default, since notice exists for handover, though many allow it with manager and HR approval. Offsetting a notice shortfall against encashment is a netting arrangement, permissible if your policy allows — but netting on the payslip does not change how the two components are treated for tax.

Do casual leave and sick leave get encashed?

In almost all Indian company policies, no. Casual leave covers short unplanned absences and lapses at year end. Sick leave is a contingency benefit, and encashing it rewards working while unwell while adding an unnecessary category to your liability. Restrict encashment to earned or privilege leave.

Why does finance care about my leave balances?

Because unused encashable leave is a balance-sheet liability. Accounting standards require accumulating compensated absences to be recognised as an expense when employees earn them, not when they are paid. Without accurate per-employee encashable balances and rates as at the reporting date, finance cannot compute the provision and the auditors will raise it. Clean leave data is a finance deliverable as much as an HR one.

Where to start

Three things to take away. The policy decisions matter more than the arithmetic — what determines the number is the wage base, divisor, caps and encashable types, so make those deliberately and apply them uniformly. The liability is real whether or not it is on your books — start with the simple method now, because waiting for an auditor or investor to ask means taking the hit at the worst moment. Verify the numbers that change — the exemption ceiling, the regime interaction and your state's provisions all move, so check them each financial year rather than trusting a rules engine configured three years ago.

Start with an audit: pull encashable balance by employee, multiply by your current per-day rate, and look at the total. If that number surprises you, fix the policy before you fix the payroll.

---

Making leave encashment boring, on purpose. CozyHR handles the parts that should never need a spreadsheet — configurable monthly accrual by leave type, carry-forward caps and accumulation ceilings that enforce themselves, encashment requests validated against policy before they reach an approver, and a payroll engine that treats encashment as its own component with the right tax handling for in-service versus exit payouts. Full and final settlement pulls the frozen balance, applies pro-rata accrual, nets recoveries and produces a statement your departing employee can actually read, while the leave liability report gives finance per-employee encashable balances and rates as at any date. If leave encashment is currently three spreadsheets and a lot of trust, try CozyHR and let the system do the arithmetic.